Bailiffs get power to use force on debtors – Times Online

Further powers for privately-employed bailiffs to use force to enter and seize private property.

It is claimed these powers are already abused. In one case, an 89-year-old grandmother returned home to find a bailiff sitting in her chair having drawn up a list of her possessions. He was pursuing a parking fine owed by her son, who did not even live at the address.

Must we learn again every lesson from history? Under New Labour, it seems so.

read more | digg story

De Menezes case – radical reform of coroner system required

In the Times, further light is thrown on the De Menezes inquest by Tom Luce, who chaired the Fundamental Review of Coroners and Death Certification in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (2001-03):

The prohibition in Rule 42 of the Coroners’ Rules on framing any verdict “in such a way as to appear to determine any question of (a) criminal liability on the part of a named person, or (b) civil liability” means that except in cases where a death is caused by an unknown and unidentified assailant, the unlawful killing verdict is rarely if ever legitimately available.

I thoroughly recommend the article. As in the case of Damian Green, we find a case for radical reform of the law.

read more | digg story

Commons officials prevent MPs asking about BBC license fee

Douglas Carswell MP writes candidly about the ability of Parliament to do its job:

The House of Commons is useless at holding those with executive power to account. If Mr Speaker presides over a Table Office that won’t allow questions about the license fee, what’s the point of Parliament or of elections to decide its composition? (The Table Office claim its because the license fee isn’t part of ministerial responsibility – but its the executive deciding what is and what isn’t their responsibiliity, not the legislature – as was once the case).

Fearsome stuff.

read more | digg story

FT.com – What to do with Britain’s banks

An excellent article from the FT:

The starting point for any analysis must be with some harsh realities.

The first is that banks enjoy a state-supported licence to create money. …

Second, the regulators failed to represent [the interests of taxpayers]. …

Third, the views of the bankers on what should be done are of small interest. …

read more | digg story

FT.com / US – Detroit reels as $14bn rescue fails

The high profile effort to agree legislation to lend $14bn to the US auto industry collapsed on Thursday night, leading the Bush administration to hold open the possibility that it would seek funds from its financial rescue plan instead.

Efforts to agree a deal in the US Senate ended in failure when Harry Reid, the leader of the Democratic majority, said negotiations with Senate Republicans were at an end and warned that millions of jobs were at stake as a result.

Both Democrats and Republicans said the sticking point was a demand to push Detroit to bring down labour costs to a par with foreign manufacturers in the US. Democrats said the move made unrealistic demands on the United Auto Workers union, while Republicans argued that no effort to restructure the industry would work without such a step.

Perhaps a loan conditional on appropriate commercial restructuring was an appropriate way to help families through this catastrophe, but it appears the coercive powers of state and union have created a destructive intransigence.

Presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul spoke powerfully in the debate:

read more | digg story

Back to the drawing board for road pricing

It looks as if it is time to pronounce the last rites for pay as you drive charging.

Good. We are already taxed according to the efficiency of our cars and the distance we drive them through fuel duty. Thankfully, we may now escape being tracked wherever we go.

read more | digg story

Update: But it appears New Labour have little interest in what people want:

The crushing rejection of a congestion charging scheme by voters in Manchester has failed to halt the Government’s determination to press ahead with technology trials for national road pricing.

Within hours of the referendum results being declared, the Department for Transport said it would press ahead with development of the costly series of studies which would underpin a pay-as-you-drive scheme, which could see motorists paying up to £1.30 a mile to drive in the rush hour.

Jean Charles de Menezes inquest: Jury reaches open verdict

From The Telegraph, the jury return an open verdict on the killing of De Menezes:

After a three-month hearing costing an estimated £6 million, jurors rejected a verdict that the innocent Brazilian had been killed lawfully by police.

They returned an ambigious, open verdict – the only other option they were given after the coroner ruled they could not find that Mr de Menezes was illegally shot dead by officers.

For those of us not completely familiar with the nuances of legal language, we are told:

The coroner had directed them to find an open verdict only if they rejected that the two marksmen who shot dead Mr de Menezes, “were acting in lawful defence of themselves or others” having “honestly although mistakenly” believed that he was a suicide bomber.

The BBC’s explanation of the verdict is also interesting: the jury decided that firearms officer C12 did not shout the warning, “armed police”. This is apparently consistent with the “Kratos” policy explained here.

How things have changed since Lee Clegg was convicted of murder and since I was trained as an armed guard and armed guard commander in the UK, facing an IRA threat.

read more | digg story

Public faith in ID cards slumps

An article illustrating the value of patience (but how difficult it is to be patient in the face of such a scheme):

The public’s faith in ID cards has slumped in the wake of a series of data loss scandals by the Government. Those in favour of the card now stand at just 55 per cent after dropping from 60 per cent in August. At the same time, opposition to the £4.7 billion scheme grew from 24 to 26 per cent in the same period, the Home Office’s own polling showed.

read more | digg story

Brown adviser: Labour’s rights record dismal

Lord Lester, a Liberal Democrat and distinguished human rights lawyer, quit as the prime minister’s adviser on constitutional reform a month ago. In a scathing attack yesterday, he revealed for the first time how he felt tethered by the government, describing its record on human rights as “dismal and deeply disappointing”.

Which makes this thread of reporting rather more interesting.

read more | digg story

Guardian: Crash Gordon ’saves the world’

Gordon Brown’s slip of the tongue in PMQs was as hilarious as it was revealing. But it may also prove very costly.

Just after midday today, we witnessed the gaffe that may eventually come to be seen as Gordon Brown’s defining moment as prime minister. You will see it on the television news tonight. You will see it on YouTube. It will be replayed whenever Brown’s career is recalled. It is all cruelly, ridiculously, terribly unfair. And yet …

Prime minister’s question time was barely under way at Westminster when Brown, anxious to drive home his usual line about how Labour’s readiness to act in the economic crisis contrasts with the Tories’ allegedly “do-nothing” approach, mangled his words. Brown obviously meant to say that Labour had not only stepped in to save the banks but was also pressing them to start lending. The words that actually left Brown’s mouth, though, were these: “We not only saved the world …”

See also Guido Fawkes.

read more | digg story

FT.com / Brussels – Berlin hits out at ‘crass’ UK strategy

At the FT:

Germany’s finance minister has launched a stinging attack on the “crass Keynesianism” pursued by Gordon Brown, the British prime minister, fuelling tensions on the eve of European economic crisis talks in Brussels.

Peer Steinbrück accuses Mr Brown in a magazine interview of “tossing around billions” and saddling a whole generation with a bill for paying off British debt.

At the Telegraph, “Brown’s economic rescue plan ineffective says German minister”:

Peer Steinbrück launched an outspoken attack on Mr Brown’s fiscal stimulus package, saying a cut in VAT would have little impact and predicting that the huge debts the Treasury is taking on will be a burden on the UK economy for a generation.

The remarks are an embarrassment for the Prime Minister, who has repeatedly claimed his plans have set the template that other countries are following.

They came the same day Mr Brown was ridiculed in the Commons for declaring that his policies had “saved the world.”

read more at The FT | read more at The Telegraph | digg story

Telegraph – Government panel to keep food prices down

The new Council of Food Policy Advisors, chaired by Dame Suzi Leather, Chair of the Charity Commission, will advise on food distribution and consumption as well as pricing.

Food shopping bills rose at their fastest rate since records began last year, with bread, rice, pasta and meat all going up by well over the rate of inflation.

And this is before the impact of the falling pound on food imports. This looks awfully like the road to price controls: price controls do not work [1, 2] and they never have:

In 284 A.D. the Roman emperor Diocletian created inflation by placing too much money in circulation, and then “fixed the maximum prices at which beef, grain, eggs, clothing and other articles could be sold, and prescribed the penalty of death for anyone who disposed of his wares at a higher figure.” The results, as Schuettinger and Butler explain, quoting an ancient historian, were that “the people brought provisions no more to markets, since they could not get a reasonable price for them and this increased the dearth so much, that at last after many had died by it, the law itself was set aside.”

Much better to let farmers get on with it.

read more | digg story

Dominic Lawson: It all went wrong when we left the gold standard

Thanks to Graham for pointing out this article by Dominic Lawson promoting Austrian-school economics:

As the chief economic advisor to the Austrian government in the 1920s, Mises put his theories into practice and slowed down inflation in his native country (which, as a Jew, he later fled). He used his “cycle” theory to forecast that the “New Era” of apparently permanent prosperity in the 1920s was illusory, and that it would end in runs on banks and depression: The Wall Street crash of 1929 was exactly what Mises had predicted.

Mises believed that any currency which was not backed by gold was powerless to resist the depredations of governments and bankers addicted to the possibilities of limitless credit. Until the past few weeks, this has been seen as a bizarrely old-fashioned and eccentric outlook; but I would not be surprised if many young people – who have hitherto been comfortable with the idea of money as something which can just exist in the ether, travelling through the digital highway – now wonder whether anything of intrinsic value lies behind it all.

As far as Mises was concerned, even money made of paper, if it had nothing behind it other than the good word of politicians and central bankers, was inherently unsound; he lived just long enough to see the United States of America – where he ended his days – break decisively with the international Gold Standard.

read more | digg story

And see also, in the Telegraph today, “Fear triggers gold shortage, drives US treasury yields below zero”:

The investor search for a safe places to store wealth as the financial crisis shakes faith in the system has caused extraordinary moves in global markets over recent days, driving the yield on 3-month US Treasuries below zero and causing a rush for physical holdings of gold.

Perhaps if money was backed by a real asset, it would serve as a real store of value and matters would be somewhat simpler.

read more | digg story

Back to the USSR

From the Guardian:

Tanks rolling into neighbouring countries, the media back under state control and Kremlin policy shrouded in secrecy … Luke Harding reports on why Russia seems hellbent on reverting to its Soviet past.

“The Soviet Union had global ambitions. It believed in socialism and social justice. Now the main ideological idea is nationalism and anti-Americanism. There are no positive ideas any more, only negative ones,” Kryshtanovskaya [Russia's leading sociologist] says.

read more | digg story

In Hard Times, Russia Moves In to Reclaim Private Industries — NY Times

Mr. Putin, the former president and current prime minister, has long maintained that Russia made a colossal error in the 1990s by allowing its enormous reserves of oil, gas and other natural resources to fall into private hands.

He has acted uncompromisingly — most notably in the case of the Yukos Oil Company in 2003 — to get them back.

Now, the Kremlin seems to be capitalizing on the economic crisis, exploiting the opportunity to establish more control over financially weakened industries that it has long coveted, particularly those in natural resources.

read more | digg story

Cameron: put the economic choice in the hands of the people

The hope of avoiding crushing debt and of fixing our society:

David Cameron has called on the Prime Minister to call an election and let the people of Britain decide what we want for our economy.

Speaking at the London School of Economics, David spoke about the “clear choice that is emerging in British politics” on the economic problems facing the country.

read more | digg story

Preston: summary fines for swearing and bad behaviour

Thanks to the Jeremy Vine Show over lunch:

Spitting, swearing and aggressive behaviour will be BANNED from ‘Proud Preston’.

Anyone who flouts the tough new code could be arrested or fined by patrolling police officers or council enforcers.

Council officers can fine people £75 for offences like littering, while police can give out fixed penalty notices of up to £80 for a range of offences.

Of course the target behaviour is unacceptable, but do we really want to replace personal responsibility with summary justice for minor misdemeanours? Callers to the show overwhelmingly thought so…

Surely we can do better?

read more | digg story

David Davis: Damian Green affair must never be repeated

Sometimes vindication can be a bitter pill. Despite the intensity of my belief that this government was systematically undermining our historic freedoms, even l was shocked by the senseless and insensitive behaviour of our police force in arresting my close friend and colleague, Damian Green.

read more | digg story

Irish will vote on EU’s Lisbon Treaty for a second time next year

Irish voters who rejected the Lisbon Treaty in June will be asked to vote again on the issue next year, paving the way for controversial EU laws to be introduced in Britain.

Predictable, but an affront nevertheless.

read more | digg story

Bill to allow Commons searches with no warrant — The Independent

From The Independent:

The vow by Commons Speaker Michael Martin to prevent “unauthorised” raids on MPs’ offices in the wake of the Damian Green affair was seriously undermined last night as it emerged that the Government is preparing new laws to allow investigators to mount parliamentary searches without a warrant.

Defending his position, Mr Martin last week pledged that no one would be allowed to search any parliamentary office until they had produced a warrant and obtained his personal permission. However, legislation included in the Queen’s Speech on the same day Mr Martin made his promise will make it simpler for officials to enter the House of Commons to carry out searches without the permission of parliamentary authorities.

The Political Parties and Elections Bill, aimed at tightening up the law on political donations, would extend the authority of Electoral Commission inspectors – or police on their behalf – to give them access to MPs’ offices as part of any investigation of alleged breaches of funding regulations. The only authorisation required would be a “disclosure notice” issued by the commission itself.

The Bill also permits the watchdog’s inspectors to enter the homes and offices of MPs and anyone who has donated to a political party, if there is a “reasonable suspicion” of a breach of the rules. A magistrate’s warrant is required but no prior notice will be given and parliamentary authorities would not be consulted in advance.

MPs have also pointed out that the infamous Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 allows covert surveillance of politicians in Parliament. We all ought to ask if our democracy is heading in a healthy direction. Many may be sick of politics and politicians but I hope and believe that the majority wish to live in a country where it is possible to oppose the government of the day, and to support financially opposition parties, without the threat of prosecution.

You can write to your MP here. If you live in a Labour constituency, or you know someone who does, I particularly recommend a letter.

read more | digg story