The Republicans and the Democrats

People occasionally ask me how the Democrats and Republicans relate to our own parties. To the extent that they do and simplistically, the Democrats are of the left and the Republicans are of the right.

However, if you look at The Political Compass, you find that the main candidates are right authoritarians, lending further substance to Ron Paul’s accusation that there is little between them. No doubt the Compass has its weaknesses, but it’s much more helpful than a simple left-right axis.

Another explanation of the origins of the main US parties might be found in certain definitions of democracy and republic as forms of government: some believe the key difference is where power is exercised, by the people themselves or by their representatives. The United States was founded as a republic, not a democracy, in these terms.

What’s really interesting though, is that when you look at the recent history of the British parties — on the second chart here — you find that from 1972, the drift to right authoritarianism was inexorable across all parties, until in 2005, something happened to reverse the trend in one party. Please take a look for yourself.

Why not take the test and see where you fall?

Skype spies give pause for thought in China – Times Online

Chinese Skype users had been delighted to find a way to circumvent their state panopticon, until they found Skype’s Chinese partner had been archiving politically-sensitive words and messages.

Back on May 20, the Times reported plans for the UK’s own phone, email and web browsing database. Time we woke up?

read more | digg story

British liberty, mapped

Found here:


View Larger Map

read more | digg story

Telegraph: “Police will keep driving records for five years”

According to the Telegraph:

Police plan to map all journeys made by drivers on major roads and store the data for five years.

A national network of roadside cameras will be able to read 50 million number plates each day enabling officers to reconstruct the movements of motorists.

In one of his satirical novels, Terry Pratchett observes:

The news that they have nothing to fear is guaranteed to strike terror into the hearts of innocents everywhere.

I’m pretty sure he’s mistaken: it’s too easy for the innocent to welcome these measures. Whether we should be terrified by the state watching us so intently is one question; another is whether it does any good.

Out canvassing, I find that when vulnerable people are being terrorized in their homes — whether by youngsters with airguns, minimoto bikes, noise, loitering, persistent vandalism, drunkenness or something else — they seem always to know who the culprits are or when the next occurrence will be. Statements are taken but there is no justice.

Are we prioritizing correctly?

read more by the Telegraph | digg story

read more by the Guardian | digg story

NUJ protest restrictions on photography in public places

“Collateral Damage”, a video by the National Union of Journalists:


More here:

Speaking after the TUC vote, NUJ General Secretary Jeremy Dear said: “Journalism is facing grave threats in an age of intolerance. Whilst on the streets dissent is being criminalized, independent journalism is being increasingly caught in the civil liberties clampdown.”

In contrast, the Peelian principles of policing make an interesting read.

EU plan: The rise and rise of the securocrats

The creation of an EU-US common security area by 2014 and “convergence” on surveillance and data gathering, redefining “home affairs” as a matter of EU internal security.

This story is reported at least by the Telegraph and the Guardian. The original leaked report is here.

To say the least, I am to be convinced that this is a good idea.

Telegraph | digg story

Guardian | digg story

Why not spy on your neighbours?

According to the Telegraph:

Advertisements looking for people to sign up for the unpaid “environmental volunteer” jobs have been posted across the country in recent months.

Critics said the scheme is encouraging a Big Brother society where friends and neighbours will be encouraged to “snoop” on one another.

A network of volunteer informants? Hasn’t this been done before?

read more | digg story

“Anti-terror laws hold kid boozers”

According to the Mirror, thirty under-age drinkers have been arrested by police using anti-terrorist legislation which addresses the misrepresentation of documents for ID purposes.

Inspector Neil Mutch in Sheffield, South Yorks, said:

It is one way of trying to keep kids out of clubs. The act was brought out for terrorism but it suits us very nicely.

read more | digg story

“Safe in our cages”

A C Grayling asks:

Will every individual have to be a tight-lipped, right-thinking, timid, dutiful, obedient, queue-forming clone to escape the censure of the unblinking eye now being opened by the state upon us?

I will not reproduce his remarks and arguments further, nor his despair. I will only ask you, again, to help.

read more | digg story

Non-police civilians given power to issue on-the-spot fines

According to the Telegraph:

Despite lacking formal police training, hundreds of civilians have been made part of the “extended police family” by the Home Office under little-known legislation.

They have not been asked to wear any special uniforms to identify themselves, but must wear only a badge that can be as small as 73mm x 80mm.

It’s difficult to know where to begin. Perhaps with the English Bill of Rights of 1689, which promised “freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial”. Or perhaps with this dramatic article.

read more | digg story