Wycombe Youth Action awarded £93,000

I am delighted that Wycombe Youth Action was successful in its application to the Transition Fund, which acts as a Big Society funding mechanism. The project received £93,000 to help young people from the ages of 13 to 25 in more positive activities that they may not otherwise have the opportunity to do.

The Transition Fund was announced last year as part of the Spending Review. So far it has committed £17 million for 201 charities; however there is £90million still available which will be announced from April 2011 onwards.

I would urge other civil society organisations in Wycombe who need additional funding to visit the website www.fundingcentral.org.uk for further information.

As Paul Burstow, Care Services Minister, has said:

Central Government can’t do everything people want in their communities – local people are better placed than officials or Ministers in Whitehall to know what their communities need. This is about a new relationship between the state and citizens, where citizens hold more power than ever before.

The Government is also setting up a Big Society Bank which will provide capital for the voluntary sector.

These are just the first steps to rekindle that mutual co-operation between individuals which typified British society. After the continued encroachment of the State over the past 100 years, we have seen a steady erosion of civil society. This is why we must reclaim local provisions and decision making.  In the long term, we need to de-politicise charitable funding but, in the meantime, the Government is seeking to drive a transition towards social responsibility, not state control. We should make the most of it.

I congratulate Wycombe Youth Action on their achievements and I wish them well with their extra funding.

Rousseau’s Form of Socialism – Alexander Gray – Mises Daily

A fascinating article on Rousseau’s Form of Socialism, discovered today, which reproduces this quote:

The first man who, having enclosed a piece of land, took it into his head to say: “This belongs to me,” and found people simple enough to believe him, was the true founder of civil society. What crimes, wars, murders, what miseries and horrors would have been spared the human race by him who, snatching out the stakes or filling in the ditch, should have cried to his fellows, “Beware of listening to this impostor; you are lost if you forget that the fruits belong to all and that the earth belongs to none.”

When a supposed intellectual has matters so very wrong, what is to be said? Read on…

The hopeful path between denial and despair is the reinvention of Britain

Via BT ruling could open pension claim floodgates – Telegraph:

Taxpayers could be on the hook for tens of billions of pounds to cover a string of privatised companies’ pension schemes after the precedent set by BT’s landmark “crown guarantee” victory.

What next, I wonder?

Between the Institute of Economic Affairs, the Adam Smith Institute, The TaxPayers’ Alliance and The Cobden Centre, it is pretty clear that the British State owes trillions of pounds.

Yes, trillions of pounds. Somewhere between £4,800,000,000,000 and £7,900,000,000,000. That is, up to about £300,000 for every household in Britain.

Much of this comprises unfunded pension liabilities, so default or inflation would be particularly wicked.

Worse, even funded pension schemes hold government debt, meaning that private pension schemes also rely on the State.  Vast swathes of the population are relying on someone else being taxed later.

The idea that the State can underwrite BT’s pension scheme is a denial of the facts. And yet, as Disraeli wrote, “Despair is the conclusion of fools.”

If we are to find a hopeful path between denial and despair, then, sooner or later, we must reinvent this country. We must stop lending to the State and start saving by investing in productive activity. Everyone who can is going to have to seek to live at their own expense. The State will have to get out of the way and let the entrepreneurs – and that is all of us – turn our fortunes around by searching creatively for opportunities to produce value for others.

The keys are these:

  • Peace – a consistent doctrine of non-aggression.
  • The family as the basic building block of society, not the State.
  • Equality before the law, not after it.
  • Freedom from arbitrary government – the classical Rule of Law.
  • Property – the unity of ownership and control.

No doubt we must rediscover virtue too, but the law cannot deliver that.

A forthcoming Channel 4 documentary will explain our situation and make the case for the reinvention of Britain. I contributed a substantial interview, although I do not know the extent to which it will be used. Its working title is Britain: The Horror Movie. It will be transmitted sometime this Autumn

In the meantime, I recommend Bastiat, who wrote:

The state is the great fiction by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else.

The Conservative Party | Helping local people save and run community facilities

Good news:

Radical new powers will be given to local residents to protect community assets from closure and allow local people to take over the running of public buildings and community assets, Conservatives announced today.

In a Party Political Broadcast to coincide with the Queen’s Speech, new policies are unveiled to create a ‘Community Right to Buy’ and allow not-for-profit community groups to take over the running of struggling local facilities, from post offices to pubs to parks.

via The Conservative Party | News | News | Helping local people save and run community facilities.

Brian Micklethwait on Toby Baxendale

Toby Baxendale

Toby Baxendale

Brian Micklethwait on my colleague, Cobden Centre Chairman, Toby Baxendale:

…You don’t get from seventy grand in debt at the age of twenty one to running a company that turns over a hundred million quid a year before you are even properly middle aged without having something about you.

The thing I find particularly intriguing about Toby is how his thinking in the academic sense and his business and social thinking are so deeply intertwined, which is sadly not true of far too many businessmen.  His early acquaintance with the economic facts of life, due to his parents divorcing early and him being raised by his single mother, meant that he came to the study of economics with a well developed sense of how the economy worked and how wealth gets created, and regular economics didn’t add up.  Too abstract.  Simply: not right.  He paid for much of this education by himself working, first by part-owning and running a night club, then by buying food for a restaurant that he part-owned, the latter activity being the basis of his later business success…

Toby is a remarkable man and I am proud to have been instrumental in establishing the educational charity he founded to promote honest money, free trade and peace in the tradition of that great statesman, Richard Cobden.

Read more.

Top tips and the clear choice in British politics

The KTM 950 Supermoto - my finest motorcycle?

The KTM 950 Supermoto

Today, I rode to church on my KTM 950 Supermoto, which revealed a couple of top tips I would like to share. On the ride home, I assembled these into an illustration of the clear choice in British politics.

Here we go.

Top tips for motorists and motorcyclists

When in the rightmost of three lanes at a roundabout, indicating right, you should turn right.  If, at the last moment, you decide to turn left into the services, go around the roundabout: do not cut across the two lanes on your left.

I am not sure whether the driver realised they had cut across me in the middle lane, but I was glad I had spotted their hesitation and was travelling with due caution. Motorcyclists: you are responsible for detecting imminent inattentive, irresponsible or unthinking behaviour in other motorists.

A top tip for government

Over-regulating causes resentment. During coffee at church, I spotted a flyer for our “new style lunch”, prompting one of the gentlest and most charming ladies I have ever known to mutter darkly about the need to abolish the Health and Safety Executive, the Food Standards Agency and, indeed, the Government.

The clear choice in British politics

There is nothing sensible the Government could have done to prevent that driver turning left across me today. Banning bikes, banning cars or physically enforcing lane disciple are all either absurd, impractical or tyrannical. It was up to the driver to drive thoughtfully and responsibly and up to me to account for that person’s failure to do so.

As for the lunch, I don’t know what the details of the new food rules are, but I know they spoiled our back-to-school barbecue and that it has taken three months or so to reach the position that we can now hold a lunch, a lunch that is “new style” and which has driven gentle people to serious irritation. The details do not really matter: what is important is that government has made life a little worse, a little more difficult and a little more expensive for people who simply want to build up society, to help people have more to do with one another in genuine — that is, freely-chosen — community.

What a triumph!

So, now we find a Queen’s Speech which suffers the vapid futility of putting targets into law, a frankly Trotskyite attempt to declare the world a new place without any practical means to make it so. And while the LibDems pour scorn on writing targets into law, they remain committed to top-down managerial government funded by an outpouring from a supposedly inexhaustible horn of plenty.

But from David Cameron’s recent conference speech:

And here is the big argument in British politics today, put plainly and simply. Labour say that to solve the country’s problems, we need more government.

Don’t they see? It is more government that got us into this mess.

Why is our economy broken? Not just because Labour wrongly thought they’d abolished boom and bust. But because government got too big, spent too much and doubled the national debt.

Why is our society broken? Because government got too big, did too much and undermined responsibility.

Why are our politics broken? Because government got too big, promised too much and pretended it had all the answers.

Very often, people tell me they want nothing to do with politics, as if politics were simply a pointless argument about who gets to sit uselessly on the green benches of the House of Commons; it is not. It is, or should be, a serious conversation about how society should operate, about whether mums and dads and grandmothers and grandfathers should be able to cook a meal for other people to their own standards. It’s about whether ceaseless regulation can protect us from every harm, or whether we have to take responsibility for ourselves and one another, getting on with our lives in the knowledge that, sometimes, stuff happens.

Top-down government has reached the end of the road. We can’t afford it and it does not work. Moreover:

Do you know the worst thing about their big government? It’s not the cost, though that’s bad enough. It is the steady erosion of responsibility. Our task is to lead Britain in a completely different direction.

Quite right: it is time for change.

Holidays 4 Heroes

Via Holidays 4 Heroes, the armed forces show how to deliver “quick reaction welfare”:

Holidays 4 Heroes is an informal group of people, including serving and retired personnel from all the UK Armed Forces and civilian supporters. We try to assist serving and former military personnel and their families, in a variety of ways that might otherwise fall outside the remit of the better-known Forces Charities. We work together through an Internet web-site used, mainly but certainly not exclusively, by Army personnel (The ARmy Rumour SErvice or “Arrse” for short – the military have a highly sophisticated sense of humour!).

It all started in December 2007, when users of the “Arrse” website and chat-room were made aware of a former serviceman in some financial difficulty and in imminent risk of being evicted from his home. In the simplest of terms, the folks had a whip-round and sorted the problem – within 48 hours the guy and his family were saved from eviction, Christmas groceries and presents for the children were provided, and everyone felt really good.

Indulge your selfishness. Go and help someone | Janice Turner – Times Online

Good news via Indulge your selfishness. Go and help someone | Janice Turner – Times Online :

Even hard-nosed City types are discovering the benefits of volunteering. So how can we harness the itch to be altruistic?

[T]he most louche and ambitious people are falling into voluntary work. Something has shifted. A decade of high consumerism has made them queasy about shopping — besides who’s spending wildly now no job is safe? — and even the biggest careerists are wondering if, after all, work truly feeds their souls. They are not hugely motivated by altruism or even rage against poverty and injustice. They just seek personal satisfaction, engagement, meaning.

It’s a start.

The Guardian on society: It’s broken. So let’s fix it

A Guardian journalist supports David Cameron:

A few months ago I might have disagreed with [Cameron]; I might have argued that he was quite simply scaremongering, that the country is at heart, just as Gordon Brown has said, basically “decent and compassionate”. But that was before this week. A week when three separate events showed the depths to which this society has finally sunk.

Again, I find I ask if it is time for a change of heart. Again, I find that this problem goes to the core of political debate.

Should we rely on an increase in state power to fix a society broken by a lack of responsibility and morality or is it the state that devours liberty, prosperity and virtue?

I reflect on what I have read, on the present seemingly boundless intervention of the state and on what my East European colleagues have told me about post-Communist societies, and I am determined that the state is the cause of this problem, not its solution.

The solution is individual people, en masse, deciding to take responsibility for restoring a civil society “of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values.” Hegel was wrong: state supervision has failed to maintain civility in society.

read more | digg story