The Government’s business strategy

The Government recently announced a number of policies to help British businesses.

They have launched the updated and overhauled businesslink.gov.uk website. This is now the primary gateway for businesses, of whatever scale, seeking support and information from the Government. It’s backed by a new telephone contact centre and many thousands of new business mentors.

They have launched a new nationally-delivered Manufacturing Advisory Service to help small and medium-sized manufacturers to grow. It is estimated that this will help generate £1.5 billion in economic growth. For more information, click here.

The Government continue their goal of cutting red tape with the extension of the Primary Authority Scheme. This allows businesses spanning local authority boundaries to nominate a particular authority under whose regulatory regime they will operate. In addition,  it will offer clearer, more straightforward guidance – so that businesses, particularly SMEs, have greater access to comprehensive guidance on what they need to do to comply. It is hoped this will create a more accountable and transparent system of local regulation and a simpler regulatory landscape.

The Make it in Great Britain campaign is aimed at transforming outdated opinions of UK manufacturing. Business Secretary, Vince Cable, said:

I want our most passionate manufacturers, whether that’s ‘captains of industry’ or those just starting out in their careers, to be our industry champions. With their help, we can modernise people’s views of manufacturing and dispel the myth that ’we don’t make anything in the UK anymore.

In Europe, despite the present instability, my colleague Mark Prisk is focusing on reducing European regulation by pressing EU officials and MEPs to follow the UK’s lead.

My colleague Douglas Carswell has been rather scathing about the Government’s progress. His post here, reminds me to ask economist David B Smith whether he believes we have moved beyond New Labour’s system, which he described as ”an economic approach that was functionally hard to distinguish from that of fascism.”  I’d certainly like to hear from businesses which believe what the Government are doing is a great help and indeed those which don’t.

I look forward to hearing the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement on 29 November. I wish I could believe it will include those measures which would be in everyone’s long term interests: worthwhile bank reform, comprehensive deregulation of business and a sufficient acceleration of the deficit reduction strategy to enable tax cuts…

Related reading:

A well-attended EU Fresh Start meeting

I just attended the inaugral AGM of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for EU reform, which was well attended by colleagues from across the range of opinion, all concerned about the effect of EU regulation on jobs and the economy. I asked that we consider democracy and the classical rule of law as the subtext to all our detailed work.

Via the website, EU Fresh Start:

UK citizens want co-operation and free commerce with our partners in the European Union, but a majority believes that too much power has been transferred to Brussels; in areas ranging from policing to employment law, from Health and Safety to financial regulation, our citizens want more control over their own lives.

The Fresh Start Project will work with MPs across party lines, along with leading ‘think tanks’, interest groups, Lords, MEPs and constitutional experts to:

1. Examine the options for a new UK-EU relationship;

2. Set out what this new relationship could look like;

3. Establish a process for achieving change; and

4. Build political support to make it happen.

I incline to the view that the EU is an unaccountable technocracy beyond redemption which should be abolished for the sake of all Europe, but I am prepared to support moves in the right direction.

Three economic dragons and a three-pronged plan

Via Future Conservatism | Conservative Home.

The three economic dragons: Britain faces much more than a debt challenge. Through no fault of their own Cameron and Osborne have inherited three historic economic challenges: massive levels of personal and government debt; the Eurozone crisis; and the long-term rise of China, India and other emerging economies. Taken together these challenges threaten to make the British economy dangerously uncompetitive in the years ahead.

Meanwhile, for the FT (£), the Prime Minister writes:

The eurozone crisis has had a chilling effect on major economies around the world; and has added to the unprecedented pressures facing the global economy. But, in spite of the difficulties, I am confident that we can both resolve the crises at hand and come through them with an economy that is stronger and fundamentally fairer. My argument here at home and at the meeting of the Group of 20 leading economies in Cannes is that we can only do so if we show complete single-mindedness on three fronts: confronting our debts; strengthening the competitiveness of our economy; and unlocking global trade. Let me take each in turn.

Sounds like the Government is determined to do the right thing and that it may garner Conservative Home’s support. Now let’s see how much proforma opposition Labour provides against essential change…

Give the Games industry a (tax) break

NB: this post is by Tim Hewish, my Parliamentary Assistant, and the views expressed are his own.

Jim McGovern, Labour MP for Dundee, called a Westminster Hall debate to address the growing disparity between the UK and other nations on the latter’s favourable tax credits towards the video games industry.

The UK has a long history of innovative creative industries; video games are one such platform: from Rareware and Eidos to Media Molecule and Rockstar Games. Currently, what we are witnessing is rapid global competition whereby graduates who study game design are being tempted away from the UK to nations who offer sizeable incentives to ply their trade elsewhere. The list is in fact quite long:

  • Canada has been successful in poaching UK companies to relocate through tax breaks. Their industry is predicted to grow by 17% over the next two years; while between 2008 and 2010, the Canadian games industry grew by 33%; although over the same period, the UK’s games industry fell by 9%
  • Pennsylvania has introduced a 25% tax break and is the 17th State to do so
  • Our neighbour, Ireland, can see the tide turning and has reacted by discussing the possibility a tax break a few weeks ago
  • Most recently, Australia has approved a $1.9Bn R&D tax relief scheme in support of its games development industry.

Industry heavyweights support these assertions, Andrew Wilson, the senior vice president of worldwide development at EA Sports, admitted that:

EA has many studios that take advantage of game tax breaks and EA Canada is certainly one of them.

He also acknowledged that EA employs, “lots of British developers at EA Canada.”

This begs the question: Why bother to train students in a growing industry in the UK for them only to move abroad due to poor incentives not enabling them to start up a business. Is UK PLC now closed for business?

As Mr. McGovern went on to say:

When we took evidence at Abertay University, we were told that, every day, students there who are studying the computer games industry and will graduate in that subject are receiving phone calls from France, Ireland and Canada saying that they will be offered a job there. Most of the students who study computer games do not end up employed by a company in the UK; they end up starting their own business.

In a climate where we talk about reorienting and rebalancing the economy and shift away from a London-centric model, this digital industry can provide investment in areas that would otherwise not be as competitive. The Regions are such examples.

As for job creation, TIGA, the body that represents the games industry, shows that tax breaks would help 2,500 new jobs to be created and would maintain and protect 3,000 current jobs.

Also of interest is that the film industry has an existing state aid exemption, which is an acknowledged piece of state aid that is registered with EU authorities. Why not other creative industries?

Mr. McGovern said that:

During the Scottish Affairs Committee inquiry, it was suggested that the tax breaks received by the film industry cost in the region of £110 million a year. The previous Government committed themselves to tax breaks for the computer games industry worth £55 million a year. However, the computer games industry generates more for our GDP than the film industry.

The Coalition has stated that the games industry is not an important cultural ambassador, while the Film Industry apparently fulfils this criterion. However, France views this rather differently. Former French Culture Minister, Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres, called for video games to receive a proper cultural recognition:

Video games are not a mere commercial product…They are a form of artistic expression involving creation from script writers, designers and directors.

There is a significant point to be recognised here. In the past, the greatest artists and musicians would have their work displayed on the easel of a gallery or at the music hall; while scriptwriters, directors and producers would be on Broadway or Hollywood. Now these talents can come together and be represented in video games. One only has to listen to the orchestral score of Zelda or Final Fantasy to hear the high calibre musicians. Rendered backgrounds also show off high quality artistic talent.

However, if we were to take the video game cultural stigma out of this argument, we have an industry that could provide more private sector jobs, reduce the brain drain that is taking place, and generate more start-ups while also retaining them. We could even fight back and make Britain more competitive and attract other talent to relocate to these shores.

This is a soundly conservative principle and one which should be backed by tax breaks, cutting red tape for SMEs and greater tax simplification. It is the only honest way out of the economic crisis because this industry generates real economic value.

The State Opening of Parliament

Today, I found myself standing by the exit into the aye lobby for the state opening of Parliament. The text of the Queen’s Speech, for which I was lucky to be able to enter the House of Lords, may be found here:

The Queen, seated on the Throne and attended by Her Officers of State, commanded that the Yeoman Usher should let the Commons know that it was Her Majesty’s pleasure that they attend Her immediately in this House.

When they had come with their Speaker, Her Majesty was pleased to speak as follows:

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons, my Government’s legislative programme will be based upon the principles of freedom, fairness and responsibility.

The first priority is to reduce the deficit and restore economic growth.

Read more.

Afterwards, I was delighted to discover my office allocation: windowless, but not shared, for which I am grateful. Now looking forward to the debate on the Speech and beginning the real business of fixing the nation’s finances, getting the economy going, reforming public services, encouraging individual and social responsibility, reforming Parliament, restoring trust to politics and, finally for the moment, restoring freedoms and civil liberties.

We can say this for Labour: they have not made our task boring.

A contract between the Conservative Party and you

Via The Conservative Party | Policy | Our Contract With You:

We go into the general election on 6 May with trust in politics and politicians at an all-time low. And I can understand why: the years of broken promises, the expenses scandal, the feeling that politicians have become too remote from the people – they’ve all taken their toll.

That’s why I’m making this contract with you.

For too long, you’ve been lied to by politicians saying they can sort out all your problems. But it doesn’t work like that. Real change is not just about what the government does. Real change only comes when we understand that we are all in this together; that we all have a responsibility to help make our country better. This contract sets out my side of the bargain: the things I want to do to change Britain. But it also makes clear that I cannot do it on my own. We will only get our economy moving, mend our broken society and reform our rotten political system if we all get involved, take responsibility, and work together.

So this is our contract with you. I want you to read it and – if we win the election – use it to hold us to account. If we don’t deliver our side of the bargain, vote us out in five years’ time.

Read more about how the Conservatives will change politics, the economy and society here.

The economy not Europe is my priority, says David Cameron

Via The Telegraph:

David Cameron, the Conservative leader, has pleaded with his MPs and voters to allow him to concentrate on fixing the fragile British economy if he becomes Prime Minister rather than having “a massive Euro bust up” over the Lisbon Treaty.

Many of us with an international perspective on human cooperation have strong, principled objections to a government that cannot be dismissed at the ballot box. However, David Cameron is right: the clear and present threat to the livelihoods of British people is the state of the economy, not the EU. And George Osborne is right: we need an economy based on save and invest.

Consider the analysis provided by my Cobden Centre colleague, Ewen Stewart:

Cobden CentreEquity Strategist Ewen Stewart makes the case that the national debt will within 5 years be over £150,000 per family of 4 with debt repayments of twice the present defence budget, up from £31 billion in 2008/9 to £70 billion in 2013/14. He explains the root causes of our difficulties and indicates a route to recovery.

It’s all over. What a fuss about nothing. The economy will soon be growing again and, look, the FTSE100 is up almost 50% since the March low. Even house prices, according to the Halifax, have risen 6 months in a row. The doom mongers were wrong. Central Banks and Keynesian public spending programmes, together with QE, have worked. Brown indeed has saved the world!

Well that would be one interpretation and a very short sighted one too, for this recovery shows all the hallmarks of a drug addict who claims to be going straight injecting a further mighty dose of the substance that has caused such decay in the first place to prolong the party.

The problem is that the underlying fault lines in the UK economy remain and, thanks to the Government’s response, are even more pronounced.

I thoroughly recommend the entire article: Happy days are here again? Another view from the City » The Cobden Centre.

We simply cannot allow ourselves to slip and let Labour retain power. Everyday British people cannot afford a hung Parliament. We must win strongly and deal with the most urgent and important problem before us: a wrecked economy.

We cannot escape our fate by sticking with Labour’s insensible reactionary fear. We must think.

We cannot keep creating new money: it would eventually destroy the economy completely1:

Continuously injecting additional amounts of money where it creates temporary demand, together with an expectation of continuously rising prices, draws labour and resources into use in areas which will last only as long as the supply of new money. These policies bring about not so much a raise in the level of employment, but a distribution of employment which cannot last and which eventually can only be maintained by ruinous levels of inflation.

We cannot keep borrowing from future generations: it is just plain wrong and the markets would stop us.

We cannot grow a healthy society by simply seizing the wealth of one and giving it to another. Try doing that with your children’s sweets: you will get little more than screaming, sobbing and tearful mumbling. It is a dead end.

Ewen’s article sets out his policy prescriptions. The way out is the grown-up way: working, saving and investing.

So here is the greatest danger this country faces: a Labour government of childish fantasists who know nothing about creating real prosperity and everything about appearing strong before the camera. They are failing us all: it is tragic.

As my friend Chris Neal — a man with a big heart for the poor and CEO of charity GB Job Clubs — has written of Labour, bringing Cromwell up to date:

It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of our democracy, and defiled by your practice of top down government; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country to the Brussels federalists for a mess of pottage and a title; and like a Judas betray your Queen and country for a few pieces of money; is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you?

Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more sense of democracy than my horse; you have sold our Gold; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for the whips? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth? Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d Parliament into a den of impotent lickspittles, by your immoral principles and wicked practices?

Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves become the greatest grievance. Your country therefore calls upon me to cleanse this Augean stable, by putting a final period to your iniquitous proceedings in this House; and which by God’s help, and the strength he has given me, I am now come to do; I command ye therefore, upon the peril of your lives, to depart immediately out of this place; go, get you out! Make haste!

Ye venal slaves be gone, not to Brussels by Eurostar but to your shires to beg the forgiveness of the people you purport to represent! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!

Further Reading

  1. See The pretence of knowledge which explains how economists come to make astrologers look good. []

George Osborne: A different vision for our economy

George Osborne has stressed that Britain needs to move from an economy built on debt to one “powered by savings and real returns on effort”.

“With reform we can not only live within our means, we can start to tackle Britain’s long standing social problems of welfare dependency, educational under-achievement, crime and persistent poverty. And we can begin to bring the national debt under control.”

via The Conservative Party | News | News | A different vision for our economy . Full text of the speech here.

Cameron: put the economic choice in the hands of the people

The hope of avoiding crushing debt and of fixing our society:

David Cameron has called on the Prime Minister to call an election and let the people of Britain decide what we want for our economy.

Speaking at the London School of Economics, David spoke about the “clear choice that is emerging in British politics” on the economic problems facing the country.

read more | digg story