Tu ne cede malis

Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

This was the motto of Ludwig von Mises, a great economist and political scientist. It comes from Virgil’s Aeneid, Book VI and it translates as, “Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it”. And so we should.

Last week, the Institute of Economic Affairs published Dr Eamonn Butler’s Ludwig von Mises Primer:

Ludwig von Mises was one of the greatest economists and political scientists of the twentieth century. He revolutionised the understanding of money, inflation and recessions; comprehensively refuted the arguments for socialism; and provided a devastating critique of the methodologies of mainstream economics. His contributions to the Austrian School laid the intellectual groundwork for thinkers such as F. A. Hayek, Murray Rothbard and Israel Kirzner.

In Ludwig von Mises – A Primer, Eamonn Butler provides a comprehensive yet accessible overview of Mises’ outstanding achievements. At a time of economic crisis, this monograph makes it clear that Mises’ work is highly relevant today. Indeed, while mainstream economics has been found wanting, the latest recession appears to have been entirely consistent with his analysis. Furthermore, the poor performance of state health and education services can be explained by Mises’ Austrian theories. Nevertheless, Mises remains neglected by the economics profession, policymakers and academics. This readable primer explains why his work should be at the core of economic thinking.

Misesian economic thinking provides a better set of explanations for recent events than the current mainstream Keynesianism or Monetarism. It predicted the crash based on sound theory. That theory uses accurate understandings of the nature of society and social cooperation, time and capital (that is, the means of production). The book explains, but this video is a good start and more fun (Hayek developed the economics of Mises to win his Nobel Prize):

I am deeply grateful to the IEA for giving me the opportunity to contribute the foreword to this book. Eamonn Butler has made a superb job of it and I very much hope it has the impact it deserves.

Buy or download the book here and see also The Pretence of Knowledge.

They meant well

“They meant well” by D R Myddelton, published by the IEA, is a tour-de-force of government project disasters. It analyses in detail:

  • The R101 Airship
  • The groundnut scheme
  • Nuclear power
  • Concorde
  • The Channel Tunnel
  • The Millenium Dome

One would have hoped it was redundant to point out that these massive programmes needed to be managed actively, but the author finds it necessary to indicate the three essentials for managing projects in progress:

  • Regular reviews, focusing on the latest estimates of the amount and timing of future cash flows,
  • Up-to-date market research,
  • An ‘exit champion’ to argue the case for abandonment.

From the conclusion:

If everyone ‘meant well’, who was to blame: politicians, civil servants, scientists, engineers or managers? No, I think what was mainly to blame was the post-second-world-war collectivist zeitgeist — the visceral distrust of markets, partly based on ignorance, which I call ‘agoraphobia’.

… An important lesson from these projects is that governments do not understand product markets where customers are free to choose…

…My own ‘solution’ is simply: let the market work. To proceed with more large government quasi-commercial projects would be a recipe for further expensive disasters. Governments that lose thousands of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money should not easily be excused on the grounds that ‘they meant well’. Those of us who advocate laissez-faire (which I define simply as ‘government non-interference’) mean well too.

Despite my aerospace engineer’s emotional attachment to Concorde, I thoroughly recommend the book.