DOGW: Celebrating 13 years of effective waste maximisation

Via ConservativeHome:

More.

Top tips and the clear choice in British politics

The KTM 950 Supermoto - my finest motorcycle?

The KTM 950 Supermoto

Today, I rode to church on my KTM 950 Supermoto, which revealed a couple of top tips I would like to share. On the ride home, I assembled these into an illustration of the clear choice in British politics.

Here we go.

Top tips for motorists and motorcyclists

When in the rightmost of three lanes at a roundabout, indicating right, you should turn right.  If, at the last moment, you decide to turn left into the services, go around the roundabout: do not cut across the two lanes on your left.

I am not sure whether the driver realised they had cut across me in the middle lane, but I was glad I had spotted their hesitation and was travelling with due caution. Motorcyclists: you are responsible for detecting imminent inattentive, irresponsible or unthinking behaviour in other motorists.

A top tip for government

Over-regulating causes resentment. During coffee at church, I spotted a flyer for our “new style lunch”, prompting one of the gentlest and most charming ladies I have ever known to mutter darkly about the need to abolish the Health and Safety Executive, the Food Standards Agency and, indeed, the Government.

The clear choice in British politics

There is nothing sensible the Government could have done to prevent that driver turning left across me today. Banning bikes, banning cars or physically enforcing lane disciple are all either absurd, impractical or tyrannical. It was up to the driver to drive thoughtfully and responsibly and up to me to account for that person’s failure to do so.

As for the lunch, I don’t know what the details of the new food rules are, but I know they spoiled our back-to-school barbecue and that it has taken three months or so to reach the position that we can now hold a lunch, a lunch that is “new style” and which has driven gentle people to serious irritation. The details do not really matter: what is important is that government has made life a little worse, a little more difficult and a little more expensive for people who simply want to build up society, to help people have more to do with one another in genuine — that is, freely-chosen — community.

What a triumph!

So, now we find a Queen’s Speech which suffers the vapid futility of putting targets into law, a frankly Trotskyite attempt to declare the world a new place without any practical means to make it so. And while the LibDems pour scorn on writing targets into law, they remain committed to top-down managerial government funded by an outpouring from a supposedly inexhaustible horn of plenty.

But from David Cameron’s recent conference speech:

And here is the big argument in British politics today, put plainly and simply. Labour say that to solve the country’s problems, we need more government.

Don’t they see? It is more government that got us into this mess.

Why is our economy broken? Not just because Labour wrongly thought they’d abolished boom and bust. But because government got too big, spent too much and doubled the national debt.

Why is our society broken? Because government got too big, did too much and undermined responsibility.

Why are our politics broken? Because government got too big, promised too much and pretended it had all the answers.

Very often, people tell me they want nothing to do with politics, as if politics were simply a pointless argument about who gets to sit uselessly on the green benches of the House of Commons; it is not. It is, or should be, a serious conversation about how society should operate, about whether mums and dads and grandmothers and grandfathers should be able to cook a meal for other people to their own standards. It’s about whether ceaseless regulation can protect us from every harm, or whether we have to take responsibility for ourselves and one another, getting on with our lives in the knowledge that, sometimes, stuff happens.

Top-down government has reached the end of the road. We can’t afford it and it does not work. Moreover:

Do you know the worst thing about their big government? It’s not the cost, though that’s bad enough. It is the steady erosion of responsibility. Our task is to lead Britain in a completely different direction.

Quite right: it is time for change.

120 Labour MPs plan to stand down at next general election | The Observer

More than 120 Labour MPs – a third of the parliamentary party – are preparing to quit Westminster at the next general election in the biggest clear-out of the parliamentary “old guard” for generations, according to senior party figures.

Last night, the party released figures showing 63 Labour MPs have already informed Gordon Brown they are going.

Information passed on to party whips suggests this total will rise to some 93 by mid-October, and could then climb by at least another 20-30 in the run-up to a general election, which is expected next spring.

via 120 Labour MPs plan to stand down at next general election | Politics | The Observer .

Britain can’t afford another year of Labour

Gordon Brown: Labour’s dilemma | Editorial | The Guardian

Even The Guardian has had enough of Gordon Brown:

Political reform can no longer be put aside as an abstract idea, of appeal to dreamers but not to voters who face the harder realities of life. The public is calling furiously for a better system. People want an honest parliament. They want leaders who are prepared to act. They loathe the old system, and many of the people who are part of it.

All must agree that the die is cast and a hard judgment made. Otherwise progressive politics will be dragged down at a general election in May 2010 that could lead to a much bigger defeat than Labour suffered in 1979. That might bring a chance for other parties to take it forward, as the Liberal Democrats are trying to do in this election. But they are not placed to enter government. Labour has a year left before an election; its current leader would waste it. It is time to cut him loose.

via Gordon Brown: Labour’s dilemma | Editorial | Comment is free | The Guardian .

Gordon Brown will be remembered as a brief and unsuccessful Prime Minister and as a less brief but more unsuccessful chancellor. That is sad for him but sadder for the United Kingdom. Of much greater long term importance is a proper understanding of the system of government we have, the system which is now failing. The Guardian calls for a revolution in the way of doing government without apparently realizing that no revolution is possible within their mindset. Do the left propose to abandon the idea that a few should choose appropriate outcomes for the many?

True progress will come when people achieve responsible independence yet have more to do with one another, freely. The appropriate system of government is not one of direction and control, of rules set and amended by unaccountable authority, of coerced action to achieve other people’s ends. The right system of society is one of freely-chosen interdependence and mutual cooperation, a system within which people are free to choose and strive for their own ends by their own means wherever neither impinges on the ends and means of another. A system within which people choose to recognize the needs of others less fortunate and help them.

The right system of society is the uncoerced free market and the welfare society. Labour will never deliver that: they will never deliver human progress worthy of the name. We need a general election. Now.