David Davis: what he said

Taken from the BBC video here. Any errors and omissions my own.

I had intended to make this statement in the House of Commons, the appropriate place in my view for something as important as this, but the Speaker ruled that because it revisited controversial issues from yesterday, that that was not appropriate.

So I am going to read you the statement that I was about to make in the House. It will take a couple of minutes.

Before I start, the name of my constituency is Haltemprice and Howden. Haltemprice is derived from a mediaeval proverb meaning “noble endeavour”. Up until yesterday, I took the view that what we did in the House of Commons representing our Constituents was a noble endeavour, because like centuries of forbears, we defended the freedoms of the British people. Well, we did, up until yesterday.

Read more

Liberty’s new hero: David Davis

David Davis has resigned as an MP in order to fight a by-election on the issue of detention without trial. His speech is well worth watching.

No doubt he will face a barrage of accusations for this. All the more reason to admire his stand.

More from David Davis here. Sensible report from the FT here.

42-day detention: the threat to our liberty | John Major

Thank goodness for John Major. If only 42-day detention stood alone in trespassing on our liberty.

I just learned that the UK’s oldest man is 112 today – sharing my birthday – and that he fought at the Somme. He underwent these and later horrors for what? So we could tyrannize ourselves today?

Tipping into despotism will not do.

read more | digg story

Classic Liberalism, by Lew Rockwell

Every four years, as the November presidential election draws near, I have the same daydream: that I don’t know or care who the president of the United States is. More importantly, I don’t need to know or care. I don’t have to vote or even pay attention to debates. I can ignore all campaign commercials. There are no high stakes for my family or my country. My liberty and property are so secure that, frankly, it doesn’t matter who wins. I don’t even need to know his name.

In my daydream, the president is mostly a figurehead and a symbol, almost invisible to myself and my community. He has no public wealth at his disposal. He administers no regulatory departments. He cannot tax us, send our children into foreign wars, pass out welfare to the rich or the poor, appoint judges to take away our rights of self government, control a central bank that inflates the money supply and brings on the business cycle, or change the laws willy-nilly according to the special interests he likes or seeks to punish.

The article is here.

Charge or Release

Liberty’s campaign continues, describing Britain’s powers as an
international disgrace.

Some snippets from their latest campaign email:

Not Genuine Emergency Powers: The proposal has been dressed up with
more language about ‘grave and exceptional terrorist threats’, but
there is still no legal requirement for a terrorist emergency to exist
and no requirement for the Home Secretary to show that 42 days
detention is urgently needed to deal with any threat. Forty-two days
could still become routine, triggered for operational convenience in
individual cases.

Parliamentary Oversight: The amendments promise more Parliamentary
oversight but, however diligent our Parliamentarians, this could not
provide anything more than a rubber-stamping exercise. The 42 day
limit would still be triggered to keep a particular individual in
custody. This would, therefore, involve Parliament debating individual
cases which could prejudice future prosecutions.

Judicial Oversight: The role of a judge in approving the use of 42
days in individual cases is of little comfort as, before a person is
charged there is, by definition, no evidence for a court to test. No
CPS application to detain a person for between 14 and 28 days has ever
been refused. The courts would not be able to overturn these ?reserve
powers? if triggered in a disproportionate or irrational way or in a
way which breaches human rights.

Please email your MP to ask them to oppose these proposals. More at:

http://www.chargeorrelease.com/

Shall we live in fear and hate or courage, tolerance and hope?

“Difficult is worth doing”

Well done them! My jumps from those planes were rather less sophisticated.

Difficult is worth doing, and not just in the air.

Free enterprise in Europe hangs on Ireland’s EU vote

Europe now hangs on the Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, “the treaty to end all EU treaties”.

The text strikes the words “free and undistorted competition” from the core objectives of the Union. Corporatist aims will enjoy a higher legal status at the European Court (ECJ) and must prevail if the two clash. The Rhineland Model has locked in a permanent advantage.

Who could claim this Treaty is democratic? Its handling has been characterised by sophistry and deception: it barely differs from the democratically-rejected Constitution.

Those who claim we live in a post ideological age are, at best, wrong.

read more | digg story

“Challenge to America”

From “Challenge to America: A Current Assessment of Our Republic” by Ron Paul:

Third Way compromise, or bipartisan cooperation, can never reconcile the differences between those who produce and those who live off others. It will only make it worse. Theft is theft, and forced redistribution of wealth is just that. The Third Way, though, can deceive and perpetuate an unworkable system when both major factions endorse the principle.

Further:

It’s important to understand how we got ourselves into this mess. The blind faith that wealth and capital can be created by the central bank’s creating money and credit out of thin air, using government debt as its collateral, along with fixing short-term interest rates, is a myth that must one day be dispelled. All the hopes of productivity increases in a dreamed-about new-era economy cannot repeal eternal economic laws.

I do recommend the article, particularly if you believe Gordon Brown can steer us through this downturn.

Hello 1984 – UK National Staff Dismissal Register to go Live

Workers accused of theft or damage could soon find themselves blacklisted on a register to be shared among employers. Innocent people could find it impossible to get another job if listed on the online database of workers accused of theft and dishonesty – regardless of whether they have been convicted of any crime.

Here we find more punishment without due process, an extension of the presumption of guilt and subjugation of the individual to another system open to abuse.

Of course employers wish to avoid hiring criminals, but branding people as criminals and punishing them without due process is deeply wrong. The episode is further evidence of the breakdown of the classical Rule of Law.

read more | digg story

Redefining “draconian”

The Times gives these accounts [1],[2] of the powers in use in Britain today, which Sir Ian Blair admits to using on the strength of “almost no evidential material at all”.

I wonder when “very very concerned” will tip into “very very very concerned”, thereby justifying new powers.

The wisdom of Solomon will be required to fix this mess.