Matthew Sinclair: Beware of multi-billion pound projects bearing jobs

On HS2 as a job creation scheme:

40,000 jobs from a £17 billion project means that each job is costing well over £400,000.  By contrast, in the wider economy the capital stock is about £3.2 trillion and that supports over 30 million jobs; just over £100,000 a job.  In other words, every job created by high speed rail comes at a cost of four jobs in the wider economy.

via ConservativeHome’s Platform: Matthew Sinclair: Beware of multi-billion pound projects bearing jobs.

HS2 Consultation launched

The consultation on HS2 has been announced today and it is open for your feedback.  You can access the consultation website here.  The Executive Summary can be found here; for the full document please click here.

HS2 is a sore issue in the Chilterns, and rightly so.  However, High Speed Rail has further repercussions, including philosophical and economic questions about the future direction of the country.

My view on HS2 was laid out during the Westminster Hall debate I called last year.

I have prepared a statement on HS2 which can be found in the Where I stand section of my blog. Here is an extract:

I applaud sincerely the Government’s noble intent, but I note that rail has not been governed by the free market for a very long time. There is no doubt that this country needs good-quality infrastructure. We should create the conditions in which unsubsidised enterprise can deliver the optimal solution. That would be the classical Liberal and Conservative approach. In my view, the solution that would emerge is not likely to be high-speed rail. I believe that this programme should be cancelled.

This is also a call to MPs and voters who live next to and along the proposed northern spur, which will travel between Manchester and Leeds: if you wish to oppose HS2 on principle, you must do so now.  Only in this stage of the consultation will the principle of High Speed rail be discussed.

Now is the time for your democratic voice to be heard on HS2.

Atlas Shrugged on the big screen

As I have reported before, there’s much in Ayn Rand’s writing that I do not like:

As an articulation of what goes wrong when government and other coercive institutions intervene in the economy and in society, it is a masterpiece. As an articulation of the timeless morals which have sustained human society, it leaves something to be desired: magnanimity. Ironically, Aristotle, who made magnanimity “the crowning virtue”, was the only philosopher to whom Rand would acknowledge a philosophical debt: it appears she missed that in his writing.

Nevertheless, I just learned that Atlas Shrugged is to appear on the big screen. Here’s the trailer for Part 1:

It is a story which uses intervention in rail to illustrate the collapse of society as government increases its control over industry, with all the inefficiency, corruption and injustice that entails.

The movie is long past overdue. The movie site is here.

Adjournment debate on HS2 today

THE Government’s High Speed 2 plans were today opposed by Wycombe MP Steve Baker in the Houses of Parliament.

Tory MP Mr Baker personally called a 90 minute debate this morning, where Transport Minister Theresa Villiers was summoned.

Read the full coverage in the BFP here. a video of the debate is available here. I am grateful to the Minister and colleagues for their participation.

Interventions in rail

I have just finished reading two superb briefings from the House of Commons Library: Price Controls and State Intervention in the Rail Market and Railways: EU Policy. Three points emerge:

  • That the Library produces first-class work: readable, clear, appropriately detailed, targeted.
  • That the rail market in the UK is far from free.
  • That the EU regularly produces reports on revitalising Europe’s railways, notably in 1996, 2001, 2003 and 2008. This regularity perhaps speaks for itself.

More anon, but I am reminded of Atlas Shrugged and its tale of intervention in rail. The IEA’s Living with Leviathan, especially chapter 7 – take a look at the book – is very much to the point, as it explains how the state is strangling social cooperation.

Still, all to the good: my case that high-speed rail and like projects are not susceptible to rational economic calculation in the current environment should be straightforward to make.

Transport Committee – UK Parliament

I was delighted this evening to be elected by colleagues to serve on Parliament’s Transport Committee:

The Transport Committee is charged by the House of Commons with scrutiny of the Department for Transport. Its formal remit was to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies.

The Committee’s powers are the same as those for other departmental select committees as set out in Standing Order No.152: principally, to send for persons, papers and records, to appoint specialist advisers, to establish a sub-committee, and to meet and report from time to time.

The Committee is made up of eleven Members of Parliament, appointed by the House of Commons and drawn from the three largest political parties.

I look forward to fulfilling this role.

Continental High Speed Rail

From our correspondent and with permission:

Dear All,

Angela and I have just come back from a trip  to Oberammergau. We went via high speed train from St Pancras to Brussels and then again from Cologne to Munich and Munich to Worgle.

The fact of the matter is that “high speed” is a fabrication. Although the trains were seemingly capable of travelling beyond 200 mph NEVER ONCE did they do so, (there is a speedometer in a communal area so you can tell). In fact they never got near it, the fastest was something less than 150 mph and each journey was subject to inexplicable delays when the trains just stopped for twenty to twenty five minutes or so, with the result that at each destination we were late in arrival. The trains themselves were not particularly comfortable, with no air conditioning and insufficient luggage space for anything other than a brief case or small bag. It was actually a joy to get back on the Chiltern Line at Marylebone where the train was on time, clean and with air conditioning.

Quite why the high speed trains never reached their potential I do not know, (economy, noise, safety???) but it would be interesting to find out.

With the best will in the world for the life of us we simply could not see why our existing networks cannot be upgraded (the Chiltern Line is already spending over £250,000,000 doing just that) rather than spending a huge amount of money, which as a country we are told we do not have, and simultaneously destroying a vast amount of our beautiful and irreplaceable countryside for the sake of speed which in so far as France, Belgium, Austria and Germany is concerned is a lie and a fallacy and actually not required.

From this it transpires that not only is the business case a complete nonsense but the reality of High Speed Trains is equally so.

Regards,

Nick.

How can we re-think government to deliver more for less?

Via HMT – Spending Challenge, an attempt to “crowd source” government spending:

The Spending Challenge is your chance to help shape the way government works. We need to reduce the deficit by cutting public spending in a way that is fair and responsible – and you can help.

It could be something small that is quick and easy to put into action, or a more radical change to where and how government works.  Either way, please be as specific as you can.

If you see ideas here already that you like the look of, then rate them and get them moved up the list. And if there’s more you’d like to say, then talk to others in the comments section.

A team has been put together right at the heart of government and their job is to make sure that your ideas and comments are taken seriously – and that the best ideas are taken forward as part of the Spending Review.

The Spending Review will set out four year spending plans for all government departments, as well as considering other areas of spending including welfare. The conclusions of the Spending Review will be published on 20 October 2010.

At a glance, there are some great ideas – scrapping HS2 and not wasting money at the end of the financial year, for example – and some awful or ridiculous ones.

You can play your part, for better or worse, here.