Bucks home to school transport consultation ends on 31 Jan

Via Bucks County Council:

Time running out for consultation on the future of home to school transport

There are only [8] days left for parents to have their say on the proposed changes to Buckinghamshire’s home to school transport policy, due to be implemented in September 2012. 

The changes, likely to affect the majority of secondary school pupils, would mean that transport will only be provided to the pupil’s nearest secondary school.  Under the existing policy, pupils currently receive free transport to their choice of catchment school, including grammar schools, if they live over 3 miles away from the school. If a child is from a low income family and is entitled to free school meals; a family is in receipt of maximum working tax credit; a child has special educational needs, a disability, mobility problems or is eligible on specific road safety criteria, the Council will continue to provide free home to school transport where the statutory criteria are met.

Mike Appleyard, Buckinghamshire County Council’s Cabinet Member for Education and Skills, has already met with parents during public meetings held across the county before Christmas. A further five meetings are due to take place before the consultation ends on 31 January.

Cllr Appleyard said: “Through these meetings, I have been made aware of some specific issues that had not been fully considered when drawing up these proposals and I am now seeking solutions which will be used to form the final policy. The final policy is not a done deal and remains subject to the findings of the consultation.  I’m grateful to parents for bringing these issues to my attention and I encourage as many parents to come along to the meetings as possible.”

The new proposals will help achieve savings of £1.4m (or 10%) from the home to school transport budget, all part of the Council’s need to cut its overall spending by 50% over the next nine years. To read the proposal in full and complete the survey online visit www.buckscc.gov.uk/schooltransport

Teachers as heroes

It’s Parliamentary recess, but recess isn’t time off: it’s time to catch up and to work in the Constituency, carrying out all those visits which simply aren’t possible when Parliament is sitting four days a week.

One of the greatest privileges I have as MP for Wycombe is visiting our schools. In the past week, I have been to Highcrest, Cressex and a nearby school for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. My overriding impression is the dedication of teachers who are transforming children’s lives and futures, often against a background of intense need.

For an example of the brilliance of our local teachers and schools, consider this article in The Times:

When you arrive at the gates of Highcrest Community School in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, there are few clues to why locals once called it “the prison on the hill”. Pupils in smart blazers sit chatting quietly on the grass verge, while others do last-minute revision in the shade of trees during their lunch break.

After years as a notorious sink school, Hatters Lane School changed its name, was turned into a specialist science and technology college and is now one of the best schools in England for improving its pupils’ chances.

It was no mean feat: 43 per cent of [Shena Moynihan's] pupils have special needs; 51 per cent speak English as a second language; 32 languages are spoken in the school and 42 per cent of pupils are listed as coming from the most deprived areas in England. The local area, known for gangs and drugs, is one in which whole families have antisocial behaviour orders slapped on them.

This is the context in which local teachers do so much to help young people succeed. In cases of the most intense need and the greatest individual and collective transformation, our teachers are nothing less than heroes, year after year.

Unfortunately, school league tables let them down. Given that the grammar school system leaves the upper schools without those pupils likely to achieve the highest academic results, it is not surprising that upper schools can deliver brilliant results for their pupils and yet appear near the bottom of academic league tables.

I went to a comprehensive school, graduating in the final year of the old ‘O’-level/CSE system. The school streamed pupils, with sets 1-3 taking ‘O’-levels and sets 4-7,8 or 9 taking CSEs. That was necessarily divisive and, had the ‘O’-level streams been removed from the two good comprehensives in St Austell, I don’t doubt they would have looked pretty awful in simplistic league tables which suit the press and politicians talking in soundbites.

Where does this leave us? Someone must do better but, on the whole, I think it’s politicians and the press who need to improve, not excellent teachers whose success is masked by institutional bias and over-simplification. I support our superb and indispensable grammar schools but I am sure we need to find a way to express the success of our differently brilliant upper schools too.

Telegraph: “Middle class to lose its grip on best state schools”

I’m sure this will attract a mixed reaction:

The Coalition is planning to allow hundreds of secondary schools to control their own entry policies and Michael Gove warmly praised the system, which allocates places according to academic ability and reserves many places for children with the weakest performance.

“Fair-banding” admissions schemes are often seen as a way of breaking the middle-class dominance in the best-performing state secondaries since they prevent affluent parents from monopolising places by paying a premium to live in their catchment areas.

Banding generally means that 11 year-olds applying for school places sit an IQ-based “attainment test” and are then divided into seven or nine ability groups. The same number of children from each ability group are then given places at the school.

via Middle class to lose its grip on best state schools – Telegraph.

I see the government is “planning to allow” not proposing to compel, so I look forward to learning what choices schools make. Grammar schools have the freedom to continue their policies if they become academies.

As my predecessor, Paul Goodman, points out at ConservativeHome, the key problem is that there are too many applicants for each good school place. That is the problem we must solve and that is why I am a supporter of the Government’s education policies.

Cressex Community School visit

Last Friday, I was delighted to have the opportunity to visit the Cressex Community School. In recent weeks, it has created local history by becoming the first state-maintained Trust School in Buckinghamshire and one of the first Cooperative Trust schools in England.

Co-operatives have a fundamental role in creating a supply-side revolution in the education system. For far too long we have been told by government what we should want and how we should receive it. Those days are thankfully over.

We want parents and pupils to have a greater say in how schools are run, as David Cameron explains in the video below:

What better way to give parents direct involvement in their children’s school than to give them effectively direct ownership of them?

This goal has been carried forward in the Coalition Agreement:

The Government believes that the innovation and enthusiasm of civil society is essential in tackling the social, economic and political challenges that the UK faces today… We will support the creation and expansion of mutuals, co-operatives, charities and social enterprises, and enable these groups to have much greater involvement in the running of public services.

The example of Cressex and its new partners — Dr Challoner’s Grammar School, Wycombe Abbey School, The Cooperative College, Buckinghamshire County Council and Buckinghamshire New University — should be congratulated and actively supported.

I feel this underlines the bond and unity Wycombe has with all its education providers – from primary all the way up to higher education.